AKHILESH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/1438/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010093562026

Filing Number

WPSS/4871/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1438/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PAY AND ALLOWANCES ( 17 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKHILESH

    Adv. HEM CHANDRA JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The court disposed of five consolidated writ petitions by daily wage forest workers seeking minimum pay scale and inclusion in an eligibility list. The court permitted petitioners to submit fresh representations to the forest authority within two weeks, with decisions to follow within four weeks thereafter, and provided job protection for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-May-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1438/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of five consolidated writ petitions by daily wage forest workers seeking minimum pay scale and inclusion in an eligibility list. The court permitted petitioners to submit fresh representations to the forest authority within two weeks, with decisions to follow within four weeks thereafter, and provided job protection for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case