SANDEEP KUMAR MAURYA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1194/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 420,384. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010093162026

Filing Number

C528/4468/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

C528/1194/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 420,384

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP KUMAR MAURYA

    Adv. TAPAN SINGH,PITAMBAR SINGH,PITAMBAR SINGH, ,AVNEESH KUMAR,NIKHIL KUSHWAHA,PITAMBAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SMT. SUNITA GAUTAM

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: C528/1194/2026 The court found merit in Sandeep Kumar Maurya's challenge to a chargesheet filed under IPC Sections 420 and 384, which alleged he coerced execution of a notarized agreement and sale deeds. The court stayed further criminal proceedings against the applicant pending deliberation and issued notice to the complainant (respondent no. 2) returnable within four weeks, directing the case be relisted after service report receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/1194/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/1194/2026 The court found merit in Sandeep Kumar Maurya's challenge to a chargesheet filed under IPC Sections 420 and 384, which alleged he coerced execution of a notarized agreement and sale deeds. The court stayed further criminal proceedings against the applicant pending deliberation and issued notice to the complainant (respondent no. 2) returnable within four weeks, directing the case be relisted after service report receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case