SANTOKH SINGH vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE UDHAM SINGH NAGAR — WPMS/1643/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.
CNR: UKHC010092912026
Filing Number
WPMS/4832/2026
Filing Date
29-May-2026
Registration No
WPMS/1643/2026
Registration Date
29-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTOKH SINGH
Adv. S R S GILL,MILIND RAJ,MILIND RAJ, ,KUNDAN SINGH,MILIND RAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE UDHAM SINGH NAGAR
-
2.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.DISTRICT LEVEL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Adv. RAHUL CONSUL
-
4.M/S SHRI SIDH JI ISPAT PVT LTD
-
5.M/S LINERS INDIA LTD
-
6.YDR ESTATES PVT LTD
Case History
-
30-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Jul-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
01-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
Case Summary: WPMS No. 1643/2026 Petitioner Santokh Singh challenged the misuse of land by respondents 4-6 in Udham Singh Nagar. The court issued notices to respondents 4-6 (returnable within four weeks) and granted interim relief: a stay on all plotting/colonization activities on the disputed land until the next hearing on 30.07.2026. Respondents were directed to file counter affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/1643/2026
Case Summary: WPMS No. 1643/2026 Petitioner Santokh Singh challenged the misuse of land by respondents 4-6 in Udham Singh Nagar. The court issued notices to respondents 4-6 (returnable within four weeks) and granted interim relief: a stay on all plotting/colonization activities on the disputed land until the next hearing on 30.07.2026. Respondents were directed to file counter affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts