SANTOKH SINGH vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE UDHAM SINGH NAGAR — WPMS/1643/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.

CNR: UKHC010092912026

Next Hearing

30th July 2026

Filing Number

WPMS/4832/2026

Filing Date

29-05-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1643/2026

Registration Date

29-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

SANTOKH SINGH

Adv. S R S GILL,MILIND RAJ,MILIND RAJ, ,KUNDAN SINGH,MILIND RAJ

Respondent(s)

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE UDHAM SINGH NAGAR

SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

Adv. C.S.C.

DISTRICT LEVEL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Adv. RAHUL CONSUL

M/S SHRI SIDH JI ISPAT PVT LTD

M/S LINERS INDIA LTD

YDR ESTATES PVT LTD

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

01-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

30-07-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

01-06-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Case Summary: WPMS No. 1643/2026 Petitioner Santokh Singh challenged the misuse of land by respondents 4-6 in Udham Singh Nagar. The court issued notices to respondents 4-6 (returnable within four weeks) and granted interim relief: a stay on all plotting/colonization activities on the disputed land until the next hearing on 30.07.2026. Respondents were directed to file counter affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMS No. 1643/2026 Petitioner Santokh Singh challenged the misuse of land by respondents 4-6 in Udham Singh Nagar. The court issued notices to respondents 4-6 (returnable within four weeks) and granted interim relief: a stay on all plotting/colonization activities on the disputed land until the next hearing on 30.07.2026. Respondents were directed to file counter affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case