SANJAY KUMAR vs MUKHYA NAGAR ADHIKARI NAGAR NIGAM HARIDWAR Advocate - SANDEEP KOTHARI — WPMS/1591/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010091342026
Filing Number
WPMS/4753/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
WPMS/1591/2026
Registration Date
27-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
30-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAY KUMAR
Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA,RAMESH NAINWAL,RAMESH NAINWAL, ,RAMESH NAINWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUKHYA NAGAR ADHIKARI NAGAR NIGAM HARIDWAR Advocate - SANDEEP KOTHARI
-
2.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
Case Summary: WPMS/1591/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of multiple writ petitions filed by Sanjay Kumar and others against Nagar Nigam Haridwar, directing the municipal corporation to consider fresh representations from petitioners within two weeks and decide them within eight weeks with reasoned orders. The petitioners had sought mandamus for payment of dues for completed civil construction works executed during 2024-2025, claiming non-payment despite completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/1591/2026
Case Summary: WPMS/1591/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of multiple writ petitions filed by Sanjay Kumar and others against Nagar Nigam Haridwar, directing the municipal corporation to consider fresh representations from petitioners within two weeks and decide them within eight weeks with reasoned orders. The petitioners had sought mandamus for payment of dues for completed civil construction works executed during 2024-2025, claiming non-payment despite completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts