PRADEEP KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMS/1551/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 29th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010089202026
Filing Number
WPMS/4642/2026
Filing Date
25-May-2026
Registration No
WPMS/1551/2026
Registration Date
25-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
29-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRADEEP KUMAR
Adv. B M PINGAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.
-
2.REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.DISTRICT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.D M
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.S D M
Adv. C.S.C.
-
6.BAHUDDESHIYA JEJJUPUR
-
7.UTTARAKHAND COOPERATIVE ELECTION TRIBUNAL
Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI
-
8.SHIV KUMAR
Adv. VIPUL SHARMA (FOR CAVEATOR)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
Case Summary: WPMS/1551/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Pradeep Kumar's writ petition seeking to quash orders dated 17.04.2026 and 25.04.2026 passed by the Registrar Cooperative Societies, finding that a statutory remedy was available. The court held that the petitioner could appeal before the Cooperative Tribunal under Sections 98(1)(h) and 98(2)(c) of the Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Act, 2003, and therefore dismissed the petition in-limine as there was no scope for judicial interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-May-2026
Fresh Cases As Defective -236
Registrar (Judicial)
-
25-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/1551/2026
Case Summary: WPMS/1551/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Pradeep Kumar's writ petition seeking to quash orders dated 17.04.2026 and 25.04.2026 passed by the Registrar Cooperative Societies, finding that a statutory remedy was available. The court held that the petitioner could appeal before the Cooperative Tribunal under Sections 98(1)(h) and 98(2)(c) of the Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Act, 2003, and therefore dismissed the petition in-limine as there was no scope for judicial interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts