ZAFAR AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1099/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 364A,386. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010086522026
Filing Number
C528/4142/2026
Filing Date
20-05-2026
Registration No
C528/1099/2026
Registration Date
20-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ZAFAR AND ORS
Adv. SAURABH KUMAR PANDEY
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
MOHD. EZAZ RANA
Adv. MOHIT PANDEY
GULSHER
Adv. MOHIT PANDEY
TAUSEEF
Adv. MOHIT PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: C528/1099/2026 The court allowed the compounding application and quashed all criminal proceedings against Zafar and others under Sections 364A and 386 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties. Despite the State's objection that these are non-compoundable offences, the court followed Supreme Court precedent permitting their compounding with judicial permission when conviction is remote due to compromise and continuation would cause prejudice to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C528/1099/2026 The court allowed the compounding application and quashed all criminal proceedings against Zafar and others under Sections 364A and 386 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties. Despite the State's objection that these are non-compoundable offences, the court followed Supreme Court precedent permitting their compounding with judicial permission when conviction is remote due to compromise and continuation would cause prejudice to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts