HARDEEP SINGH ALIAS LAADDI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/872/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),109,351(2),191(2),191(3),190,3(5),61(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 22nd May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010086472026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1/4140/2026

Filing Date

20-05-2026

Registration No

BA1/872/2026

Registration Date

20-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

22nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),109,351(2),191(2),191(3),190,3(5),61(2)
Arms Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) Section 25-1(1-B)

Petitioner(s)

HARDEEP SINGH ALIAS LAADDI

Adv. HARSHIT SANWAL,PANKAJ KAPIL,PANKAJ KAPIL, ,PANKAJ KAPIL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

22-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

22-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Case Summary: BA1/872/2026 Court Decision: The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Hardeep Singh alias Laaddi, accused in a double murder case involving the deaths of the informant's father and brother. The court found the applicant made out a sufficient case for bail considering the overall facts and circumstances, despite prosecution arguments about weapon recovery and CCTV evidence linking him to the crime. Conditions: The applicant must furnish a personal bond with two reliable sureties and cooperate with trial proceedings without misusing the granted liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA1/872/2026 Court Decision: The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Hardeep Singh alias Laaddi, accused in a double murder case involving the deaths of the informant's father and brother. The court found the applicant made out a sufficient case for bail considering the overall facts and circumstances, despite prosecution arguments about weapon recovery and CCTV evidence linking him to the crime. Conditions: The applicant must furnish a personal bond with two reliable sureties and cooperate with trial proceedings without misusing the granted liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case