SAHZAD vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — BA1/813/2026

Case under Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 (Act No. 06 of 2007) Section 3,5/11. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010082262026

Filing Number

BA1/3945/2026

Filing Date

15-May-2026

Registration No

BA1/813/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 (Act No. 06 of 2007) Section 3,5/11
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (Act No. 59 of 1960) Section 3/11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHZAD

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    Case Summary: BA1/813/2026 - Sahzad v. State of Uttarakhand The court granted bail to Sahzad, who was arrested under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act for alleged possession of meat. The court found that since the co-accused was already granted bail and no FSL report has been produced to establish the nature of the recovered meat, the applicant made out a fit case for bail. He was released on personal bond and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  4. 15-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA1/813/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA1/813/2026 - Sahzad v. State of Uttarakhand The court granted bail to Sahzad, who was arrested under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act for alleged possession of meat. The court found that since the co-accused was already granted bail and no FSL report has been produced to establish the nature of the recovered meat, the applicant made out a fit case for bail. He was released on personal bond and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case