BIRAM AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/929/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147,148,149,323,452,504,506. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010075162026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

C528/3575/2026

Filing Date

05-05-2026

Registration No

C528/929/2026

Registration Date

05-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147,148,149,323,452,504,506

Petitioner(s)

BIRAM AND ORS

Adv. BHARAT SINGH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

JITENDRA

Adv. R P SINGH

RAFAL SINGH

Adv. R P SINGH

RESHAMA DEVI

Adv. R P SINGH

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

07-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

07-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Case Summary: C528/929/2026 The court allowed the compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No. 877 of 2025 against Biram and others after the parties reached an amicable settlement. Judge Alok Mahra held that under Supreme Court precedent, non-compoundable offences (Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 452, 504, 506 IPC) can be compounded with court permission when compromise renders conviction remote, and continuing proceedings would cause prejudice to the accused. The FIR and chargesheet were accordingly quashed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/929/2026 The court allowed the compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No. 877 of 2025 against Biram and others after the parties reached an amicable settlement. Judge Alok Mahra held that under Supreme Court precedent, non-compoundable offences (Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 452, 504, 506 IPC) can be compounded with court permission when compromise renders conviction remote, and continuing proceedings would cause prejudice to the accused. The FIR and chargesheet were accordingly quashed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case