BHUPENDRA SINGH ALIAS RAJU vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/885/2025
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/21. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010073152025
Filing Number
BA1/3673/2025
Filing Date
21-05-2025
Registration No
BA1/885/2025
Registration Date
21-05-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHUPENDRA SINGH ALIAS RAJU
Adv. SAURABH KUMAR PANDEY,SARITA BISHT,SARITA BISHT, ,SARITA BISHT
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2025 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 18-04-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 17-04-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 17-03-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 13-02-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
Orders
Case Summary: BA1/885/2025 - Bhupendra Singh @ Raju v. State of Uttarakhand The court granted bail to the applicant charged with NDPS Act violations and Arms Act offenses. Although the recovered contraband quantity was commercial, the court found the recovery and incident "doubtful" due to procedural irregularities: arrest memo and inventory contained the FIR number despite a six-hour gap before FIR registration, with no corresponding entry in police records. Additionally, eight months after charge framing, no prosecution witnesses had been examined, violating the accused's right to speedy trial under Article 21. The court balanced personal liberty against delayed proceedings and approved bail on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: BA1/885/2025 - Bhupendra Singh @ Raju v. State of Uttarakhand The court granted bail to the applicant charged with NDPS Act violations and Arms Act offenses. Although the recovered contraband quantity was commercial, the court found the recovery and incident "doubtful" due to procedural irregularities: arrest memo and inventory contained the FIR number despite a six-hour gap before FIR registration, with no corresponding entry in police records. Additionally, eight months after charge framing, no prosecution witnesses had been examined, violating the accused's right to speedy trial under Article 21. The court balanced personal liberty against delayed proceedings and approved bail on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts