Anil Kumar Bisht PANKAJ MIGLANI, ,AAKIB AHMED vs State of Uttarakhand Advocate - C.S.C. — WPPIL/88/2025
Case under Uttarakhand (Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901) Amendment Act, 2020 (Act No. 04 of 2021) Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010072332025
Next Hearing
: -
e-Filing Number
20-05-2025
Filing Number
WPPIL/3593/2025
Filing Date
20-05-2025
Registration No
WPPIL/88/2025
Registration Date
20-05-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION ( 45 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anil Kumar Bisht PANKAJ MIGLANI, ,AAKIB AHMED
Respondent(s)
State of Uttarakhand Advocate - C.S.C.
Haridwar Roorkee Development Authority
Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI
Ritu Agrawal
Adv. VIVEK PATHAK
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-05-2025 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 06-05-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 04-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 04-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 04-08-2025 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPPIL No. 88/2025 Outcome: Case adjourned for two weeks. The court permitted respondent no.3 to file a fresh compounding application online for the sealed building portion, to be decided by respondent no.2 (HRDA) with a speaking order. Parties must maintain strict status quo pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPPIL No. 88/2025 Outcome: Case adjourned for two weeks. The court permitted respondent no.3 to file a fresh compounding application online for the sealed building portion, to be decided by respondent no.2 (HRDA) with a speaking order. Parties must maintain strict status quo pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts