SURENDRA SINGH vs SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMS/867/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 16th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010053622026
Filing Number
WPMS/2845/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPMS/867/2026
Registration Date
06-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURENDRA SINGH
Adv. VISHWA PRAKASH BAHUGUNA,SAIF HAMEED,SAIF HAMEED, ,SAIF HAMEED
-
2.RAJEEV GAUTAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER Advocate - C.S.C.
-
2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY
Adv. NARESH PANT
-
4.TEHSILDAR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.REVENUE SUB INSPECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
The court disposed of three consolidated petitions regarding delayed land compensation for NH-72 acquisition, directing the Competent Authority, Land Acquisition, Dehradun to decide the petitioners' representation within two months as per law, while also hearing any other claimants with rights over the acquired land. Both NHAI and the State raised no objections to this approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
-
08-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/867/2026
The court disposed of three consolidated petitions regarding delayed land compensation for NH-72 acquisition, directing the Competent Authority, Land Acquisition, Dehradun to decide the petitioners' representation within two months as per law, while also hearing any other claimants with rights over the acquired land. Both NHAI and the State raised no objections to this approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts