SAGAR ALIAS SAMPURN KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/480/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,61(2),125,351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010048602026

Filing Number

BA1/2275/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

BA1/480/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,61(2),125,351(3)
Arms Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) Section 25/3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAGAR ALIAS SAMPURN KUMAR

    Adv. GAURAV SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Sagar alias Sampurn Kumar in a case involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Arms Act, finding sufficient grounds for bail at that stage. The court accepted the applicant's arguments that he was not named in the FIR, was not present at the incident, had no specific role assigned, relied on vague evidence, and a co-accused with similar charges was already granted bail. The applicant was ordered released on personal bond with two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA1/480/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Sagar alias Sampurn Kumar in a case involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Arms Act, finding sufficient grounds for bail at that stage. The court accepted the applicant's arguments that he was not named in the FIR, was not present at the incident, had no specific role assigned, relied on vague evidence, and a co-accused with similar charges was already granted bail. The applicant was ordered released on personal bond with two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case