SAGAR ALIAS SAMPURN KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/480/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,61(2),125,351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010048602026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1/2275/2026

Filing Date

27-03-2026

Registration No

BA1/480/2026

Registration Date

27-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

11th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,61(2),125,351(3)
Arms Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) Section 25/3

Petitioner(s)

SAGAR ALIAS SAMPURN KUMAR

Adv. GAURAV SINGH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

01-04-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

30-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

11-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Sagar alias Sampurn Kumar in a case involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Arms Act, finding sufficient grounds for bail at that stage. The court accepted the applicant's arguments that he was not named in the FIR, was not present at the incident, had no specific role assigned, relied on vague evidence, and a co-accused with similar charges was already granted bail. The applicant was ordered released on personal bond with two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Sagar alias Sampurn Kumar in a case involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Arms Act, finding sufficient grounds for bail at that stage. The court accepted the applicant's arguments that he was not named in the FIR, was not present at the incident, had no specific role assigned, relied on vague evidence, and a co-accused with similar charges was already granted bail. The applicant was ordered released on personal bond with two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case