SHADAB vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/124/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 75. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.

Next hearing 22-May-2026

CNR: UKHC010042812026

Filing Number

CRLA/2018/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLA/124/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

R.I. UPTO 10 YEARS & FINE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 75
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) Section 7/8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHADAB

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. 22-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    Summary: Bail application granted. Appellant Shadab, convicted by trial court under Section 75 IPC and Sections 7/8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for a three-year rigorous imprisonment sentence, was released on bail on personal bond and two sureties. The court considered that appellant was on bail during trial without misusing liberty and is currently on interim bail. Criminal appeal admitted and case listed for 22.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/124/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Bail application granted. Appellant Shadab, convicted by trial court under Section 75 IPC and Sections 7/8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for a three-year rigorous imprisonment sentence, was released on bail on personal bond and two sureties. The court considered that appellant was on bail during trial without misusing liberty and is currently on interim bail. Criminal appeal admitted and case listed for 22.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case