ABDUL KADIR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/462/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/21/29. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010040862026
Filing Number
C528/1920/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
C528/462/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABDUL KADIR
Adv. CHANDRA PRAKASH,RAJNEESH CHAUHAN,RAJNEESH CHAUHAN, ,RAJNEESH CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SUB INSPECTOR, AMIT NAUTIYAL
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
Summary: The court stayed the proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No. 386 of 2025 against the applicant in an NDPS Act case, finding prima facie that the applicant was falsely implicated based only on vague statements of a co-accused and that Section 37 of NDPS Act does not apply. The State was directed to file a counter-affidavit within three weeks, with the matter to be listed thereafter for further deliberation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
-
06-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. C528/462/2026
Summary: The court stayed the proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No. 386 of 2025 against the applicant in an NDPS Act case, finding prima facie that the applicant was falsely implicated based only on vague statements of a co-accused and that Section 37 of NDPS Act does not apply. The State was directed to file a counter-affidavit within three weeks, with the matter to be listed thereafter for further deliberation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts