ABDUL KADIR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/462/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/21/29. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010040862026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

C528/1920/2026

Filing Date

17-03-2026

Registration No

C528/462/2026

Registration Date

17-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/21/29

Petitioner(s)

ABDUL KADIR

Adv. CHANDRA PRAKASH,RAJNEESH CHAUHAN,RAJNEESH CHAUHAN, ,RAJNEESH CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

SUB INSPECTOR, AMIT NAUTIYAL

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

19-03-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

21-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

10-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

06-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

21-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Summary: The court stayed the proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No. 386 of 2025 against the applicant in an NDPS Act case, finding prima facie that the applicant was falsely implicated based only on vague statements of a co-accused and that Section 37 of NDPS Act does not apply. The State was directed to file a counter-affidavit within three weeks, with the matter to be listed thereafter for further deliberation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court stayed the proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No. 386 of 2025 against the applicant in an NDPS Act case, finding prima facie that the applicant was falsely implicated based only on vague statements of a co-accused and that Section 37 of NDPS Act does not apply. The State was directed to file a counter-affidavit within three weeks, with the matter to be listed thereafter for further deliberation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case