M/s. Aishwarya Constructions vs M/s. Amsri Builders Pvt Ltd Advocate - DEEPAK MISRA — WA/1526/2025

Case under Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

CNR: HBHC010816622025

Next Hearing

05th May 2026

Filing Number

WA/60570/2025

Filing Date

30-12-2025

Registration No

WA/1526/2025

Registration Date

30-12-2025

Judge

MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA , GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR

Coram

MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA , GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 27 )

Sub-Category

REGISTRATION OF DEED OR DOCUMENT ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Acts & Sections

Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15

Petitioner(s)

M/s. Aishwarya Constructions

Adv. NALAMALPU PAVAN KRISHNA REDDY

Mr. C.V.S. Rajaram,

Respondent(s)

M/s. Amsri Builders Pvt Ltd Advocate - DEEPAK MISRA

M/s. Amsri Infra Projects Pvt Ltd.

The State of Telangana

Adv. GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION

The Commissioner and Inspector General of Registrations and Stamps

Hearing History

Judge: MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA , GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR

31-12-2025

FOR ADMISSION

05-05-2026

ADMISSION

28-04-2026

ADMISSION

20-04-2026

ADMISSION

13-04-2026

ADMISSION

Orders

28-04-2026
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA,GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR

Summary: The High Court for the State of Telangana allowed five interim applications (I.A.Nos. 5-8 of 2026) filed by appellants in Writ Appeals 1435 and 1526 of 2025 to correct typographical errors in dates across various paragraphs of the writ appeals and affidavits. The Court held that such corrections of clerical date errors are not substantive amendments barred by the CPC proviso to Order VI Rule 12, and directed the Registry to implement these amendments. The cases are adjourned to 05.05.2026 for hearing on the condone delay petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court for the State of Telangana allowed five interim applications (I.A.Nos. 5-8 of 2026) filed by appellants in Writ Appeals 1435 and 1526 of 2025 to correct typographical errors in dates across various paragraphs of the writ appeals and affidavits. The Court held that such corrections of clerical date errors are not substantive amendments barred by the CPC proviso to Order VI Rule 12, and directed the Registry to implement these amendments. The cases are adjourned to 05.05.2026 for hearing on the condone delay petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case