Smt. Rangu Sathavva, W/o. Sri. Rangu Ramulu, vs The State of Telangana, Revenue Department, Rep. by its Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/28475/2017
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HBHC010688542017
Filing Number
WP/159477/2017
Filing Date
18-Aug-2017
Registration No
WP/28475/2017
Registration Date
23-Aug-2017
Judge
Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy
Coram
Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION SEC 23 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 20-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt. Rangu Sathavva, W/o. Sri. Rangu Ramulu,
Adv. G JHANSI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana, Revenue Department, Rep. by its Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE
-
2.The District Collector, Rajanna Sircilla, Rajanna Sircilla
-
3.The Joint Collector Rajanna Sircilla, Rajanna Sircilla
-
4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajanna Sircilla, Rajanna
-
5.The Tahsildar, Thangallapalli Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla
-
6.The Tahsildar, Sircilla Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
J Sreenivas Rao,alok AradheView PDF
The High Court of Telangana disposed of the writ petition without deciding the merits, directing that the matter be referred to a competent authority under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 within four weeks. The competent authority must then decide the petitioner's claim regarding land acquisition compensation within six months, allowing her to raise all permissible objections and submit relevant material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Nov-2019
For Admission ( Dormant Case )
P Naveen Rao
-
06-Nov-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Aug-2017
Case filed
Registration No. WP/28475/2017
The High Court of Telangana disposed of the writ petition without deciding the merits, directing that the matter be referred to a competent authority under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 within four weeks. The competent authority must then decide the petitioner's claim regarding land acquisition compensation within six months, allowing her to raise all permissible objections and submit relevant material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts