M/s. Kancharla Constructions Pvt. Ltd vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/18022/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: Admission (Revenue). Next hearing: : -.

Admission (Revenue) Next hearing —

CNR: HBHC010372862026

Filing Number

WP/27012/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/18022/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

B.Vijaysen Reddy

Coram

B.Vijaysen Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

DEMOLITION ( 63 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s. Kancharla Constructions Pvt. Ltd

    Adv. MUBEENA FATHIMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collector

  3. 3.The Gram Panchayat

  4. 4.The District Panchayat Officer

  5. 5.Mohammed Hadi Ali

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 18022/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Telangana ordered status quo to be maintained regarding the subject property and listed the case along with related contempt case (C.C. No. 714 of 2026) for further hearing before a co-ordinate bench on 12.06.2026. The court directed that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner's property pending disposal of appeal Dr No. 362 of 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Admission (Revenue)

    B.Vijaysen Reddy

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18022/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 18022/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Telangana ordered status quo to be maintained regarding the subject property and listed the case along with related contempt case (C.C. No. 714 of 2026) for further hearing before a co-ordinate bench on 12.06.2026. The court directed that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner's property pending disposal of appeal Dr No. 362 of 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case