G.Upender vs G.Ramulu — SA/257/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

CNR: HBHC010362212026

Next Hearing

09th July 2026

Filing Number

SA/26253/2026

Filing Date

09-06-2026

Registration No

SA/257/2026

Registration Date

09-06-2026

Judge

NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

Coram

NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SA ( 22 )

Sub-Category

DECLARATION OF TITLE(IMMOVABLE PROPERTY) ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL Section

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 100

Petitioner(s)

G.Upender

Adv. N PRAVEEN REDDY

Smt. G. Dhana Laxmi

Respondent(s)

G.Ramulu

G. Rajendra Prasad

G.Sathish Kumar

G.Raju

G. Nagaraju

G.Pradeep Kurnar

Smt. M.Shivamma

Smt. Pochamma

G. Srinivas

G. Gopal

G.Bala Krishna

Smt. Varamma

M. Satyanarayana

M. Sainath

Hearing History

Judge: NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

11-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION

09-07-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

11-06-2026
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

Case Summary: SA/257/2026 The High Court of Telangana admitted the appeal filed by G. Upender and G. Dhana Laxmi on 11.06.2026. The Court identified two substantial questions of law: (A) whether the lower court properly appreciated ratification deeds (Ex.A-13 and A-14) wherein the legal heirs admitted the appellants' entitlement to half share (133 Sq. yds) of a 266 Sq. yds property, and (B) whether both courts committed irregularity by failing to consider evidence in a registered sale deed mentioning ancestral land. The case was posted for next hearing on 09.07.2026, with appellants permitted to serve notice on respondents through SPAD. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA/257/2026 The High Court of Telangana admitted the appeal filed by G. Upender and G. Dhana Laxmi on 11.06.2026. The Court identified two substantial questions of law: (A) whether the lower court properly appreciated ratification deeds (Ex.A-13 and A-14) wherein the legal heirs admitted the appellants' entitlement to half share (133 Sq. yds) of a 266 Sq. yds property, and (B) whether both courts committed irregularity by failing to consider evidence in a registered sale deed mentioning ancestral land. The case was posted for next hearing on 09.07.2026, with appellants permitted to serve notice on respondents through SPAD. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case