G.Upender vs G.Ramulu — SA/257/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Status: For Admission. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
CNR: HBHC010362212026
Filing Number
SA/26253/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
SA/257/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
Coram
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SA ( 22 )
Sub-Category
DECLARATION OF TITLE(IMMOVABLE PROPERTY) ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL Section
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.G.Upender
Adv. N PRAVEEN REDDY
-
2.Smt. G. Dhana Laxmi
Respondent(s)
-
1.G.Ramulu
-
2.G. Rajendra Prasad
-
3.G.Sathish Kumar
-
4.G.Raju
-
5.G. Nagaraju
-
6.G.Pradeep Kurnar
-
7.Smt. M.Shivamma
-
8.Smt. Pochamma
-
9.G. Srinivas
-
10.G. Gopal
-
11.G.Bala Krishna
-
12.Smt. Varamma
-
13.M. Satyanarayana
-
14.M. Sainath
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jul-2026
For Admission
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
-
11-Jun-2026
Namavarapu Rajeshwar RaoView PDF
Case Summary: SA/257/2026 The High Court of Telangana admitted the appeal filed by G. Upender and G. Dhana Laxmi on 11.06.2026. The Court identified two substantial questions of law: (A) whether the lower court properly appreciated ratification deeds (Ex.A-13 and A-14) wherein the legal heirs admitted the appellants' entitlement to half share (133 Sq. yds) of a 266 Sq. yds property, and (B) whether both courts committed irregularity by failing to consider evidence in a registered sale deed mentioning ancestral land. The case was posted for next hearing on 09.07.2026, with appellants permitted to serve notice on respondents through SPAD. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SA/257/2026
Case Summary: SA/257/2026 The High Court of Telangana admitted the appeal filed by G. Upender and G. Dhana Laxmi on 11.06.2026. The Court identified two substantial questions of law: (A) whether the lower court properly appreciated ratification deeds (Ex.A-13 and A-14) wherein the legal heirs admitted the appellants' entitlement to half share (133 Sq. yds) of a 266 Sq. yds property, and (B) whether both courts committed irregularity by failing to consider evidence in a registered sale deed mentioning ancestral land. The case was posted for next hearing on 09.07.2026, with appellants permitted to serve notice on respondents through SPAD. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts