Smt.K.Sabitha vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/17421/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
CNR: HBHC010357112026
Filing Number
WP/25898/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/17421/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Coram
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
REVENUE ( 37 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt.K.Sabitha
Adv. SRINIVAS VELAGAPUDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE
-
2.The Collector
-
3.The Joint Collector
-
4.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
-
5.The Deputy Collector and Tahsildar
-
6.The Cyberabad Municipal Corporation,
Case History
-
07-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Jul-2026
Admission (Revenue)
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
09-Jun-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
CASE SUMMARY - WP 17421/2026 Smt. K. Sabitha challenged two notices dated 02.05.2026 regarding land resumption in Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, totaling approximately 1.31 acres. The respondent State/revenue authorities allegedly took possession via panchanama dated 03.06.2026. Outcome: The High Court granted interim relief by maintaining status quo on the subject property and directed both parties to preserve the status quo obtaining on the date of hearing. The court postponed the case to 07.07.2026 to allow the respondents to file their counter-affidavits, citing the long-standing litigation spanning three decades. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
For Admission
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
08-Jun-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/17421/2026
CASE SUMMARY - WP 17421/2026 Smt. K. Sabitha challenged two notices dated 02.05.2026 regarding land resumption in Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, totaling approximately 1.31 acres. The respondent State/revenue authorities allegedly took possession via panchanama dated 03.06.2026. Outcome: The High Court granted interim relief by maintaining status quo on the subject property and directed both parties to preserve the status quo obtaining on the date of hearing. The court postponed the case to 07.07.2026 to allow the respondents to file their counter-affidavits, citing the long-standing litigation spanning three decades. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts