VISHESH SINHA vs STATE OF TELANGANA Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV — WP/16676/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010341802026

Filing Number

WP/24962/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

WP/16676/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

T.madhavi Devi

Coram

T.madhavi Devi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF HYDERABAD ( 25 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHESH SINHA

    Adv. SARASWATHI MUNGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF TELANGANA Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV

  2. 2.Cyberabad Municipal Corporation

  3. 3.The Deputy Commissioner

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    T.madhavi DeviView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 16676/2026 - Vishesh Sinha v. State of Telangana The High Court of Telangana disposed of the writ petition at admission stage with consent of both parties. Petitioner Vishesh Sinha, holding valid building permission from 30.11.2024 for construction (stilt plus three floors), sought protection against threatened demolition by Cyberabad Municipal Corporation without due process. The Court directed respondents not to interfere with construction if compliant with the sanctioned plan, while reserving authority to take legal action if any deviation occurs. The petition was disposed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    T.madhavi Devi

  4. 14-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16676/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 16676/2026 - Vishesh Sinha v. State of Telangana The High Court of Telangana disposed of the writ petition at admission stage with consent of both parties. Petitioner Vishesh Sinha, holding valid building permission from 30.11.2024 for construction (stilt plus three floors), sought protection against threatened demolition by Cyberabad Municipal Corporation without due process. The Court directed respondents not to interfere with construction if compliant with the sanctioned plan, while reserving authority to take legal action if any deviation occurs. The petition was disposed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case