ANAND KUMAR LAHOTI vs State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV — WP/16685/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010341602026

Filing Number

WP/24948/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

WP/16685/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

T.madhavi Devi

Coram

T.madhavi Devi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

DEMOLITION-REMOVAL ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANAND KUMAR LAHOTI

    Adv. SARDAR JASBEER SINGH

  2. 2.Smt Priyanka Lahoti

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV

  2. 2.The Commissioner

  3. 3.The Zonal Commissioner

  4. 4.The Deputy Commissioner

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    T.madhavi DeviView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/16685/2026 Court Decision: The Telangana High Court set aside the demolition order dated 05-05-2026 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation against the petitioners' residential property at Esamiya Bazar. The court found the demolition order lacked basis because the show cause notice failed to specify details of alleged construction deviations from approved building plans. The court allowed the municipal authorities to issue a fresh show cause notice with specific deviation details and permitted the petitioners to respond before any further action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    T.madhavi Devi

  4. 14-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16685/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/16685/2026 Court Decision: The Telangana High Court set aside the demolition order dated 05-05-2026 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation against the petitioners' residential property at Esamiya Bazar. The court found the demolition order lacked basis because the show cause notice failed to specify details of alleged construction deviations from approved building plans. The court allowed the municipal authorities to issue a fresh show cause notice with specific deviation details and permitted the petitioners to respond before any further action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case