P. Sainath vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV — WP/16669/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010341502026

Filing Number

WP/24943/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

WP/16669/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

T.madhavi Devi

Coram

T.madhavi Devi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MISCELLANIOUS ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. Sainath

    Adv. M DURGA PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV

  2. 2.The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation

  3. 3.The Deputy Commissioner

  4. 4.The Assistant City Planner

  5. 5.B.Susheela

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    T.madhavi Devi

  3. 15-May-2026

    T.madhavi DeviView PDF

  4. 15-May-2026

    T.madhavi DeviView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 16669/2026 (P. Sainath v. State of Telangana) The writ petition was admitted on a "notice before admission" basis. The court issued notice to Respondent No.5 (B. Susheela) to show cause by 17.06.2026 why the petition should not be admitted. Respondents 1-4 (State and GHMC officials) waived further notice and sought time to file counters. An interim direction was granted restraining authorities from taking coercive action against the petitioner regarding his property pending the next hearing on 17.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 15-May-2026

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    T.madhavi Devi

  6. 14-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16669/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 16669/2026 (P. Sainath v. State of Telangana) The writ petition was admitted on a "notice before admission" basis. The court issued notice to Respondent No.5 (B. Susheela) to show cause by 17.06.2026 why the petition should not be admitted. Respondents 1-4 (State and GHMC officials) waived further notice and sought time to file counters. An interim direction was granted restraining authorities from taking coercive action against the petitioner regarding his property pending the next hearing on 17.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case