Shaik Kareem vs Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — WP/16666/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010341432026

Filing Number

WP/24939/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

WP/16666/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

G.M. Mohiuddin

Coram

G.M. Mohiuddin

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

TO FOLLOW RBI GUIDELINES ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shaik Kareem

    Adv. BONTHU LOKESH PHANINDRA REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India

  2. 2.Reserve Bank of India (RBI)

  3. 3.SMFG India Credit Company Limited

  4. 4.YES BANK

  5. 5.EarlySalary Services Pvt. Ltd

  6. 6.MAS Financial Services Ltd

  7. 7.Bajaj Finance Limited

  8. 8.RBL Bank Limited

  9. 9.Axis Bank Ltd

  10. 10.IDFC FIRST Bank

  11. 11.TATA CAPITAL LIMITED

  12. 12.Indusind Bank Limited

  13. 13.Adithya Birla Capital Limited

  14. 14.Kotak Mahindra Bank

  15. 15.Incred Financial Services Limited

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Admission (Central Govt.)

    G.M. Mohiuddin

  3. 14-May-2026

    G.M. MohiuddinView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY - WP/16666/2026 The High Court of Telangana issued a Show Cause Notice on the Writ Petition filed by Shaik Kareem challenging alleged illegal recovery practices by multiple financial institutions (banks and NBFCs). The petitioner sought a declaration that the respondents' recovery attempts violated RBI Circular dated 12.08.2022 and Articles 14, 21, and 13 of the Constitution, and sought restraint from coercive recovery measures. The Court directed the respondents (RBI and 13 financial institutions) to show cause by 17.06.2026 as to why the petition should not be admitted, and mandated strict compliance with RBI guidelines and Supreme Court precedents on recovery procedures during pendency of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16666/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY - WP/16666/2026 The High Court of Telangana issued a Show Cause Notice on the Writ Petition filed by Shaik Kareem challenging alleged illegal recovery practices by multiple financial institutions (banks and NBFCs). The petitioner sought a declaration that the respondents' recovery attempts violated RBI Circular dated 12.08.2022 and Articles 14, 21, and 13 of the Constitution, and sought restraint from coercive recovery measures. The Court directed the respondents (RBI and 13 financial institutions) to show cause by 17.06.2026 as to why the petition should not be admitted, and mandated strict compliance with RBI guidelines and Supreme Court precedents on recovery procedures during pendency of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case