Smt.Katravath Taxi vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/16595/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010337362026
Filing Number
WP/24608/2026
Filing Date
06-May-2026
Registration No
WP/16595/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
G.M. Mohiuddin
Coram
G.M. Mohiuddin
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
REVENUE ( 37 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt.Katravath Taxi
Adv. PILLIX LAW FIRM
-
2.Smt.Katravath Kandirya
-
3.Sri Kartavath Tavurya
-
4.Sri Katravath Gorya
-
5.Sri Katravath Chandru
-
6.Sri Sabayat Tirupati
-
7.Sri Sabayat Ravi
-
8.Sri Megavath Limbya
-
9.Sri Katravath Mangya
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE
-
2.The Commissioner of Appeals
-
3.The District Collector
-
4.The Revenue Division officer
-
5.The Tahsildar
-
6.The Bhoodan Yagna Board
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jun-2026
Admission (Revenue)
G.M. Mohiuddin
-
15-May-2026
G.M. MohiuddinView PDF
Summary of WP No. 16595 of 2026 The Telangana High Court issued a "notice before admission" on the writ petition filed by nine petitioners challenging the Commissioner of Appeals' order dated 30.08.2025, which dismissed their statutory appeal regarding land classification. The petitioners argued the impugned order was non-speaking, lacked application of mind, and failed to address whether subject lands (Sy.Nos.119-122, Vemulanarva Village) are Bhoodan lands, citing contrary evidence from the Additional Collector and Bhoodan Board. The court granted interim suspension of the impugned order pending detailed examination and directed respondents to show cause by 22.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/16595/2026
Summary of WP No. 16595 of 2026 The Telangana High Court issued a "notice before admission" on the writ petition filed by nine petitioners challenging the Commissioner of Appeals' order dated 30.08.2025, which dismissed their statutory appeal regarding land classification. The petitioners argued the impugned order was non-speaking, lacked application of mind, and failed to address whether subject lands (Sy.Nos.119-122, Vemulanarva Village) are Bhoodan lands, citing contrary evidence from the Additional Collector and Bhoodan Board. The court granted interim suspension of the impugned order pending detailed examination and directed respondents to show cause by 22.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts