Smt.K.Sabitha vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/11026/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: Admission (Municipal Admn.). Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
CNR: HBHC010231222026
Filing Number
WP/16629/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/11026/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
N.v.shravan Kumar
Coram
N.v.shravan Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MISCELLANIOUS ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 13-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt.K.Sabitha
Adv. SRINIVAS VELAGAPUDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE
-
2.The State of Telangana
Adv. GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV
-
3.The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
-
4.The Hyderabad Disaster Response and Asset Protection Agency (HYDRAA)
Case History
-
20-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
Admission (Municipal Admn.)
N.v.shravan Kumar
-
16-Apr-2026
Admission (Municipal Admn.)
N.v.shravan Kumar
-
13-Apr-2026
Admission (Municipal Admn.)
N.v.shravan Kumar
-
10-Apr-2026
N.v.shravan KumarView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Telangana (WP No. 11026 of 2026) partially allowed the petitioner's plea against HYDRAA's action of fencing land in Khanamet Village. The court directed the District Collector of Ranga Reddy to be impleaded as a necessary party and ordered HYDRAA not to fence any land merely based on prohibited list entries without seeking clarification from the jurisdictional District Collector. The case was posted for further hearing on 13.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/11026/2026
Summary: The High Court of Telangana (WP No. 11026 of 2026) partially allowed the petitioner's plea against HYDRAA's action of fencing land in Khanamet Village. The court directed the District Collector of Ranga Reddy to be impleaded as a necessary party and ordered HYDRAA not to fence any land merely based on prohibited list entries without seeking clarification from the jurisdictional District Collector. The case was posted for further hearing on 13.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts