Sudharkar vs The State of Telangana, Through SHO PS - PS -WPS, DD Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/5209/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010217892026

Filing Number

CRLP/6061/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLP/5209/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

J Sreenivas Rao

Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Quash the proceedings U/s.498-A I.P.C ( 65 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sudharkar

    Adv. G PARUSHARAM GOUD

  2. 2.Smt. Laxmi Bai

  3. 3.Durgesh

  4. 4.Mallaiah

  5. 5.Shekar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana, Through SHO (Station House Officer) PS (Police Station) - PS (Police Station) -WPS, DD Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Divya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

    The Telangana High Court quashed criminal proceedings against five accused persons for alleged dowry harassment and criminal intimidation, finding that the Magistrate took cognizance without applying mind or assigning reasons, violating principles established in *Sunil Bharati Mittal v. CBI*. However, the court permitted the Magistrate to re-initiate proceedings with proper reasoning in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/5209/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Telangana High Court quashed criminal proceedings against five accused persons for alleged dowry harassment and criminal intimidation, finding that the Magistrate took cognizance without applying mind or assigning reasons, violating principles established in *Sunil Bharati Mittal v. CBI*. However, the court permitted the Magistrate to re-initiate proceedings with proper reasoning in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case