S.V.K.K.B.A. Lakshma Rao, vs State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4917/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010208652026

Filing Number

CRLP/5801/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4917/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

J Sreenivas Rao

Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Other offences not covered(Misc.) ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.V.K.K.B.A. Lakshma Rao,

    Adv. A SATYASIRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Dongari Chandra Shekar,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

    Summary The Telangana High Court quashed a cryptic docket order dated 08.12.2021 passed by the First Class Magistrate at Kollapur (C.C. No. 495 of 2021), finding that the magistrate took cognizance against the accused without recording satisfaction or assigning reasons, and issued summons mechanically using a rubber stamp. The court held that issuing process to an accused is a serious matter requiring the magistrate to apply mind and form a prima facie opinion of an offense, and permitted the magistrate to retake cognizance and pass fresh orders in accordance with law with proper reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4917/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Telangana High Court quashed a cryptic docket order dated 08.12.2021 passed by the First Class Magistrate at Kollapur (C.C. No. 495 of 2021), finding that the magistrate took cognizance against the accused without recording satisfaction or assigning reasons, and issued summons mechanically using a rubber stamp. The court held that issuing process to an accused is a serious matter requiring the magistrate to apply mind and form a prima facie opinion of an offense, and permitted the magistrate to retake cognizance and pass fresh orders in accordance with law with proper reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case