K. Prasanna vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/9396/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.

Next hearing 21-Apr-2026

CNR: HBHC010195902026

Filing Number

WP/14142/2026

Filing Date

28-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/9396/2026

Registration Date

28-Mar-2026

Judge

B.Vijaysen Reddy

Coram

B.Vijaysen Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MISCELLANEOUS ( 89 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K. Prasanna

    Adv. ROHIT POGULA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collector

  3. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer

  4. 4.The Tahsildhar

  5. 5.M. Bhagyamma

  6. 6.M. Srinivas Reddy

  7. 7.M. Padma

  8. 8.M.Praveena

  9. 9.Gudur Sanjeeva Reddy

  10. 10.Thota Mohan Reddy

  11. 11.K. Madhu Mohan Reddy

Case History

  1. 21-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Admission (Revenue)

    B.Vijaysen Reddy

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF

    Summary: The Telangana High Court issued a Show Cause Notice before admission in Writ Petition No. 9396 of 2026. The Court directed notice to be served on respondents 5-11 to show cause why the petition challenging the Tahsildar's attempt to process property registrations should not be admitted. An interim direction was granted restraining the Tahsildar from entertaining any transactions regarding the disputed land parcels in Thumkunta Village until the next hearing on 21.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/9396/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Telangana High Court issued a Show Cause Notice before admission in Writ Petition No. 9396 of 2026. The Court directed notice to be served on respondents 5-11 to show cause why the petition challenging the Tahsildar's attempt to process property registrations should not be admitted. An interim direction was granted restraining the Tahsildar from entertaining any transactions regarding the disputed land parcels in Thumkunta Village until the next hearing on 21.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case