Battula Kumara Swamy vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/3289/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 28th April 2026.
CNR: HBHC010064232026
Filing Number
WP/4823/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP/3289/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Judge
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Coram
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
FIXATION OF BOUNDARIES ( 66 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 13-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Battula Kumara Swamy
Adv. S KRISHNA SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE
-
2.The District Collector
-
3.The Revenue Divisional officer
-
4.The Tahsildar
-
5.The Assistant Director
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
The Telangana High Court dismissed Battula Kumara Swamy's petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus to compel the survey and boundary demarcation of his residential plots (Sy.Nos. 14 and 15) in Madhapur village. The court upheld a government circular prohibiting such demarcation for residential plots and directed the petitioner to hire a licensed surveyor for the survey at his own cost. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Admission (Revenue)
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
27-Apr-2026
Admission (Revenue)
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
15-Apr-2026
Admission (Revenue)
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
10-Apr-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Admission (Revenue)
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
13-Mar-2026
Admission (Revenue)
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
11-Mar-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Admission
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
18-Feb-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
For Admission
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
04-Feb-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3289/2026
The Telangana High Court dismissed Battula Kumara Swamy's petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus to compel the survey and boundary demarcation of his residential plots (Sy.Nos. 14 and 15) in Madhapur village. The court upheld a government circular prohibiting such demarcation for residential plots and directed the petitioner to hire a licensed surveyor for the survey at his own cost. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts