Modem Vijay Kumar vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/3021/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HBHC010058092026
Filing Number
WP/4380/2026
Filing Date
30-Jan-2026
Registration No
WP/3021/2026
Registration Date
31-Jan-2026
Judge
E.V. Venugopal
Coram
E.V. Venugopal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
NOT TO HARASS ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Modem Vijay Kumar
Adv. KARRA V V S N MURTHY
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR HOME
-
2.The Commissioner of Police
-
3.The Station House Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
Admission (Home)
E.V. Venugopal
-
01-Apr-2026
E.V. VenugopalView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
E.V. VenugopalView PDF
The High Court of Telangana heard a writ petition by Modem Vijay Kumar against police obstruction of his legal construction on his own property. The petitioner argued that the Station House Officer acted arbitrarily by orally directing him not to proceed with construction and by seeking Section 164 BNSS proceedings without FIR registration, violating his fundamental rights. The court adjourned the case to 08.04.2026 for the Government Pleader to file instructions, dispensing with further appearance of the respondent officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Admission (Home)
E.V. Venugopal
-
31-Mar-2026
E.V. VenugopalView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
Admission (Home)
E.V. Venugopal
-
03-Mar-2026
E.V. VenugopalView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Admission (Home)
E.V. Venugopal
-
03-Feb-2026
E.V. VenugopalView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3021/2026
The High Court of Telangana heard a writ petition by Modem Vijay Kumar against police obstruction of his legal construction on his own property. The petitioner argued that the Station House Officer acted arbitrarily by orally directing him not to proceed with construction and by seeking Section 164 BNSS proceedings without FIR registration, violating his fundamental rights. The court adjourned the case to 08.04.2026 for the Government Pleader to file instructions, dispensing with further appearance of the respondent officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts