CHAIRMAN,MAHARANI RADHABAI VIDYARTHI VASTIGRAH . vs MAHADEV MURLIDHAR GANBAWALE . — C.A. No. 1198/2011
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010339622008
Filing Date
21-Nov-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 1198/2011
Diary Number
33962/2008
Order Date
11-Feb-2020
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHAIRMAN,MAHARANI RADHABAI VIDYARTHI VASTIGRAH .
Adv. NARESH KUMAR[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHADEV MURLIDHAR GANBAWALE .
Adv. T. HARISH KUMAR[R-1] SACHIN PATIL[R-2]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Feb-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2020
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
06-Feb-2020
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
16-Jan-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2020
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
15-Jan-2020
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
14-Jan-2020
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
12-Dec-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant
-
11-Dec-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant
-
10-Dec-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Nov-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1198/2011
Case Summary: C.A. No. 001198/2011 Outcome: The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal and upheld the respondent teacher's reinstatement. The Court directed that Respondent No. 1 be entered on a surplus teacher list with seniority benefits and ordered Rs. 8,00,000 in back wages payable within three months. The Court held that since the school failed to follow proper retrenchment procedures under Rule 26 of the Maharashtra Private Schools Regulation Act 1977, the teacher must be absorbed by the Education Officer in an available school position or provided repatriation rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts