ARUN KUMAR AGGARWAL vs STATE OF M.P.. — Crl.A. No. 1706 - 1708/2011

Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010281602009

Filing Date

15-Sep-2009

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1706 - 1708/2011

Diary Number

28160/2009

Order Date

09-Oct-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARUN KUMAR AGGARWAL

    Adv. ROHIT KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF M.P..

    Adv. B. S. BANTHIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) C. D. SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated) SENTHIL JAGADEESAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 30-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 28-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 23-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 21-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 02-Sep-2011

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 16-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 04-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 24-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 07-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 29-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 08-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 25-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 21-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 08-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 15-Sep-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1706 - 1708/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal Nos. 1706-1708 of 2011 The Supreme Court discharged the contempt notice against the State of Madhya Pradesh on October 9, 2012, accepting the unconditional apology from Shri Ashwini Kumar Rai, the present Secretary of General Administration Department, for non-compliance with the Court's September 2, 2011 judgment that directed compliance within two months. The Court's decision to discharge the notice was influenced by the Central Government's refusal to sanction prosecution of Shri Raghav Chandra (vide order dated July 3, 2012). However, the Court clarified that appellant Arun Kumar Aggarwal remains free to pursue appropriate legal remedies against the Central Government's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case