MOHAN LAL vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT CHIEF SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 726/2010
Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010279122009
Filing Date
14-Sep-2009
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 726/2010
Diary Number
27912/2009
Order Date
16-Jan-2020
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHAN LAL
Adv. B. K. SATIJA[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT CHIEF SECRETARY
Adv. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jan-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2020
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari
-
19-Sep-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2014
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
05-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Oct-2009
ROPView PDF
-
14-Sep-2009
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 726/2010
Summary: The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of appellant Mohan Lal and another under Section 409 read with Section 34 IPC for misappropriation of Rs. 11,000 in 1976, but modified the sentence. Considering the 33-year delay, that the misappropriated amount had been repaid with interest, and the appellants' advanced age (80 and 88 years), the Court commuted their prison sentences to time already served plus a fine of Rs. 5,000 each, with three months additional imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remained unpaid. The appeals were allowed to this extent on January 16, 2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts