COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE vs M/S BHEL THROUGH DIRECTOR — C.A. No. 8490/2009

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010243772009

Filing Date

18-Aug-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 8490/2009

Diary Number

24377/2009

Order Date

07-Feb-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

    Adv. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S BHEL THROUGH DIRECTOR

    Adv. NARESH KUMAR[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Feb-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 07-Feb-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi

  4. 31-Jan-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 31-Jan-2018

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi

  6. 30-Jan-2018

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi

  7. 24-Jan-2018

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi

  8. 18-Jan-2018

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi

  9. 17-Jan-2018

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi

  10. 14-Dec-2017

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi

  11. 07-Dec-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 15-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 18-Aug-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8490/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Commissioner of Central Excise v. M/S BHEL Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the Commissioner's appeal on 7 February 2018, upholding lower authorities' decision that boiler components cleared by BHEL as parts but essential for boiler operation should be classified under tariff sub-heading 8402.10 (10% duty) rather than 8402.90 (15% duty for parts). Reasoning: The Court relied on expert opinion from the Ministry of Commerce defining essential boiler components (drum, fittings, mountings) and HSN tariff notes providing that unassembled machines transported in parts for convenience must be classified as complete machines if components are essential to their function, not as separate parts. Next Steps: No further directions were given; the matter concluded with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case