KUMUDRAI JAYANTILAL JOSHI vs STATE OF GUJARAT . — Crl.A. No. 1090/2013
Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010241832009
Filing Date
17-Aug-2009
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1090/2013
Diary Number
24183/2009
Order Date
01-Aug-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KUMUDRAI JAYANTILAL JOSHI
Adv. SUMITA RAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT .
Adv. KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated) HEMANTIKA WAHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2009
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1090/2013
Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 1090/2013 Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Gujarat High Court's order quashing the cheque dishonour proceedings. The court held that while the complaint was filed prematurely (before the mandatory 15-day notice period under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act), this did not prevent the Magistrate from taking cognizance after the statutory period expired. Facts: Kumudrai Jayantilal Joshi filed a Section 138 complaint after an account-payee cheque for Rs. 92,035 (dated October 20, 2003) drawn on Unnati Cooperative Bank was dishonoured on November 14, 2003. The complaint was filed December 1, 2003—before the required 15-day notice period had fully elapsed. Next Steps: The Learned Magistrate shall proceed with Criminal Case No. 1139 of 2003 and endeavour to dispose of it within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts