KUMUDRAI JAYANTILAL JOSHI vs STATE OF GUJARAT . — Crl.A. No. 1090/2013

Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010241832009

Filing Date

17-Aug-2009

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1090/2013

Diary Number

24183/2009

Order Date

01-Aug-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUMUDRAI JAYANTILAL JOSHI

    Adv. SUMITA RAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT .

    Adv. KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated) HEMANTIKA WAHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 18-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 13-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 25-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 19-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 26-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 11-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 31-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 17-Aug-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1090/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 1090/2013 Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Gujarat High Court's order quashing the cheque dishonour proceedings. The court held that while the complaint was filed prematurely (before the mandatory 15-day notice period under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act), this did not prevent the Magistrate from taking cognizance after the statutory period expired. Facts: Kumudrai Jayantilal Joshi filed a Section 138 complaint after an account-payee cheque for Rs. 92,035 (dated October 20, 2003) drawn on Unnati Cooperative Bank was dishonoured on November 14, 2003. The complaint was filed December 1, 2003—before the required 15-day notice period had fully elapsed. Next Steps: The Learned Magistrate shall proceed with Criminal Case No. 1139 of 2003 and endeavour to dispose of it within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case