MALTI DEVI vs RAMESHWAR PANDEY . — C.A. No. 3291/2012
Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010230702009
Filing Date
04-Aug-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 3291/2012
Diary Number
23070/2009
Order Date
25-Feb-2020
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MALTI DEVI
Adv. SUBHRO SANYAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMESHWAR PANDEY .
Adv. ADARSH UPADHYAY SAMIR ALI KHAN R. C. KAUSHIK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Feb-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2020
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari
-
19-Feb-2020
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna
-
03-Oct-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai
-
01-Oct-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Aug-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3291/2012
Case Summary: Malti Devi v. Rameshwar Pandey (C.A. No. 003291/2012) Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed Malti Devi's appeal on February 25, 2020, upholding the Patna High Court's May 6, 2009 order that had rejected her original claim and suit. The Court found no valid grounds to interfere with the High Court's well-considered decision under Article 136 of the Constitution. Next Steps: The dismissal does not prevent Malti Devi from enforcing any legal rights available to her in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts