RAJ KUMAR VERMA vs MAHENDRA DEO . — SLP(C) No. 20574/2009

Case under Section XI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010226462009

Filing Date

31-Jul-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 20574/2009

Diary Number

22646/2009

Order Date

13-Oct-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR VERMA

    Adv. H. S. PARIHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDRA DEO .

    Adv. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 06-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 28-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 25-Feb-2011
  7. 08-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 30-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 19-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 09-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 10-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 03-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 31-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 20574/2009

  14. 22-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 08-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 06-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 06-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 29-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 03-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 16-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 08-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 20-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 18-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 28-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 20574/2009 - Raj Kumar Verma v. Mahendra Deo On 13 October 2011, the Supreme Court dismissed SLP(C) No. 20574/2009, a seniority dispute petition by Raj Kumar Verma. The Court found the issues were covered against the petitioner by the precedent decision in *Pawan Pratap Singh & Ors. v. Reevan Singh & Ors.* (2011) 3 SCC 267. The dismissal does not affect a separate restoration petition filed by the petitioner challenging the 1992 seniority list before the High Court, which shall be decided on its own merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case