STANDARD CHARTERED BANK vs AWAZ . — C.A. No. 5278/2008
Case under Consumer Disputes and Rera : Appeals Under Section 23 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 And/or Under Section 67 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Section XVII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010225552008
Filing Date
07-Aug-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 5278/2008
Diary Number
22555/2008
Order Date
20-Dec-2024
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Appeals Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STANDARD CHARTERED BANK
Adv. ARUN KUMAR BERIWAL (Dead / Retired / Elevated) ANANTA PRASAD MISHRA[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.AWAZ .
Adv. H. S. PARIHAR CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI MANISH K. BISHNOI SHIEL SETHI GAGAN GUPTA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-5]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Dec-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
-
19-Sep-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
-
18-Sep-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
-
12-Sep-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
-
11-Sep-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
-
28-Aug-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
-
31-Aug-2023
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
-
10-Aug-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
-
13-Jul-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh
-
10-May-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar
-
01-Mar-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar
-
09-Feb-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar
-
23-Nov-2022
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
-
07-Apr-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari
-
06-Apr-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari
-
05-Apr-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari
-
08-Mar-2022
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose
-
03-Mar-2022
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose
-
21-Jan-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
-
20-Jan-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
-
19-Jan-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra
-
04-Mar-2020
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
03-Mar-2020
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
12-Dec-2019
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
10-Dec-2019
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
01-Oct-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
-
24-Sep-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Sep-2015
ROPView PDF
-
23-Sep-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
23-Sep-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
16-Jul-2015
ROPView PDF
-
16-Jul-2015
ROPView PDF
-
26-Mar-2015
ROPView PDF
-
26-Mar-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
26-Mar-2015
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jan-2015
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jan-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
05-Nov-2014
ROPView PDF
-
20-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2014
ROPView PDF
-
20-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
06-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
06-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
20-Mar-2013
ROPView PDF
-
15-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
10-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
10-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
17-Aug-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-Aug-2012
ROPView PDF
-
05-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
05-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
13-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2010
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
03-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2008
ROPView PDF
-
07-Aug-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5278/2008
-
[ 2024 INSC 1044 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters
Lead case: C.A. No. 5273/2008
Summary: Standard Chartered Bank v. AWAZ (C.A. No. 5278/2008) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeals of the banks and set aside the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's (NCDRC) July 7, 2008 judgment, which had declared that charging credit card interest rates exceeding 30% p.a. constitutes an unfair trade practice. Key Findings: 1. Locus Standi Issue: The Court held that the respondent trust organization lacked standing to file the complaint as trusts are not "persons" under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and failed to obtain prior permission under Section 13(6) to act in a representative capacity. 2. Jurisdictional Bar: The Court determined that interest rate determination falls exclusively within the Reserve Bank of India's statutory domain under Sections 21A and 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The NCDRC exceeded its jurisdiction by encroaching on RBI's regulatory functions. 3. No Unfair Trade Practice: The Court found no evidence of deceptive practices or misrepresentation. Banks had transparently disclosed interest rates in terms and conditions provided to cardholders. 4. Contract Validity: The Court upheld that credit card holders were educated consumers who agreed to disclosed terms; the NCDRC improperly attempted to rewrite contractual terms between willing parties. Next Steps: None—the judgment is final, setting aside all NCDRC directions regarding interest rate caps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts