SURINDER SINGH vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . — SLP(C) No. 19463/2009
Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010224082009
Filing Date
30-Jul-2009
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 19463/2009
Diary Number
22408/2009
Order Date
21-Feb-2012
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURINDER SINGH
Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .
Adv. A. S. BHASME (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2009
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 19463/2009
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 19463/2009 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions on 21 February 2012. The Court upheld the High Court's decision sustaining CIDCO's cancellation of plot No. 207/B, N-3 allotted to petitioners Surinder Singh and Jaimal Singh. Key Facts & Reasoning: One petitioner already owned a residential-cum-commercial plot (No. 76, N-2/A) when they jointly applied for another residential plot in a 2006 Lucky Draw Scheme, falsely declaring in their affidavit that neither held any CIDCO plot. After winning the draw, CIDCO issued a show cause notice and cancelled the allotment. The Supreme Court found the petitioners deliberately withheld documents from the High Court record and made false statements to mislead the Court, holding this conduct disentitled them from relief under Article 136 of the Constitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts