SURINDER SINGH vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . — SLP(C) No. 19463/2009

Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010224082009

Filing Date

30-Jul-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 19463/2009

Diary Number

22408/2009

Order Date

21-Feb-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURINDER SINGH

    Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

    Adv. A. S. BHASME (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 12-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 14-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 01-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 30-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 24-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 17-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 30-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 19463/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 19463/2009 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions on 21 February 2012. The Court upheld the High Court's decision sustaining CIDCO's cancellation of plot No. 207/B, N-3 allotted to petitioners Surinder Singh and Jaimal Singh. Key Facts & Reasoning: One petitioner already owned a residential-cum-commercial plot (No. 76, N-2/A) when they jointly applied for another residential plot in a 2006 Lucky Draw Scheme, falsely declaring in their affidavit that neither held any CIDCO plot. After winning the draw, CIDCO issued a show cause notice and cancelled the allotment. The Supreme Court found the petitioners deliberately withheld documents from the High Court record and made false statements to mislead the Court, holding this conduct disentitled them from relief under Article 136 of the Constitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case