MANDAKINI D BHALERAO vs RAM LABBHYA SURI(D) TR.LRS.. — SLP(C) No. 20851/2009

Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010224012009

Filing Date

30-Jul-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 20851/2009

Diary Number

22401/2009

Order Date

01-Nov-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANDAKINI D BHALERAO

    Adv. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAM LABBHYA SURI(D) TR.LRS..

    Adv. SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE TARA CHANDRA SHARMA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 01-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 26-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 22-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 07-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 15-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 13-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 15-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 31-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 30-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 20851/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 020851/2009 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed Mandakini D Bhalerao's special leave petition challenging the Bombay High Court's order. The Court upheld the trial Court's decision to refuse condonation of delay in filing an application to bring the legal representatives of the deceased defendant on record. Reasoning: The Court found the trial Court's detailed analysis sound, noting the petitioner failed to adequately explain months of delay. The petitioner's excuse—the plaintiff's CA's old age and harassment by the deceased defendant's legal heirs—was deemed insufficient justification for inaction on a matter the plaintiff knew about. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case