SABU MATHEW GEORGE vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SECRETARY — W.P.(C) No. 341/2008

Case under Section PIL-W. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010214582008

Filing Date

29-Jul-2008

Registration No

W.P.(C) No. 341/2008

Diary Number

21458/2008

Order Date

13-Dec-2017

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2017 INSC 1221

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section PIL-W

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SABU MATHEW GEORGE

    Adv. MANJULA GUPTA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SECRETARY

    Adv. ANUPAM LAL DAS (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1] S. S. SHROFF[R-5] ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-2] E. C. AGRAWALA[R-3]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Dec-2017

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Dec-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 13-Dec-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud

  5. 24-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 24-Nov-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud

  7. 05-Sep-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 05-Sep-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 13-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 13-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 11-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 16-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 16-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 16-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 16-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 19-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 19-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 23-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 23-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 25-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 25-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 05-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 05-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 18-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 18-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 12-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 30-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 30-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 26-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 26-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 19-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 19-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 11-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 28-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 28-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 15-Dec-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 15-Dec-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 04-Dec-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 04-Dec-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 22-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 22-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 18-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 14-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 14-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 05-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 11-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 24-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 13-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 26-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 13-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 29-Jul-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. W.P.(C) No. 341/2008

  53. [ 2017 INSC 1221 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Dr. Sabu Mathew George v. Union of India (WP(C) 341/2008) The Supreme Court disposed of a writ petition challenging inadequate enforcement of the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 against search engines. The petitioner sought directions to block websites promoting sex selection services. The Court held that search engines, through in-house expert committees and a government Nodal Agency coordination mechanism, must actively identify and remove content violating Section 22 of the Act, recognizing women's equal constitutional rights and the critical need to address India's declining sex ratio through robust internet regulation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case