BHAG SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 1485/2009

Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010207292008

Filing Date

03-Jun-2008

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1485/2009

Diary Number

20729/2008

Order Date

03-Aug-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAG SINGH

    Adv. ABHA R. SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY

    Adv. KULDIP SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 03-Aug-2017

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  4. 02-Aug-2017

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  5. 01-Aug-2017

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  6. 26-May-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 25-May-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  8. 24-May-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 06-May-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 10-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 22-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 25-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 17-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 07-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 24-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 09-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 03-Jun-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1485/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bhag Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside the convictions and life sentences of three appellants (Bhag Singh, Baj Singh, and Bagicha Singh) for murder, kidnapping, and related offences under IPC Sections 302, 364, 201, and 148/149. The Court found the circumstantial evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and directed their immediate release. Key Findings: The Court identified critical infirmities in the prosecution's case: identical disclosure statements lacked credibility, the alleged extra-judicial confession was actually hearsay, the wooden staff recovered from one accused matched no post-mortem injuries, and personal belongings recovered from two accused were unidentified. The Court held that motive alone cannot sustain conviction without corroborating evidence. Judgment Date: August 3, 2017 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case