SUNIL ANCHALIA vs NARENDRA KUMAR ANCHALIA — SLP(C) No.(Verified On 18-4-2026)

Case under Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : Challenge to Arbitral Award, Matters Relating to Execution Under Section 36, Under Section 34/Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and Challenges to Arbitral Award Under Arbitration Act, 1940 Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010204652026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No.(Verified On 18-4-2026)

Diary Number

20465/2026

Order Date

24-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : Challenge to arbitral award, matters relating to execution under Section 36, under Section 34/Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and challenges to arbitral award under Arbitration Act, 1940 Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL ANCHALIA

    Adv. SOUMYA DUTTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARENDRA KUMAR ANCHALIA

    Adv. ARUN K. SINHA [caveat]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No.(Verified On 18-4-2026)

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 20465/2026 Sunil Anchalia & Ors. v. Narendra Kumar Anchalia & Ors. The Supreme Court granted permission to file the special leave petition but declined to entertain it on merits, citing its earlier order dated 30.08.2024. The Court directed the petitioners to approach the District Judge, Birbhum at Suri, where they have already filed an intervention application challenging the respondents' claim to compensation disbursement. The District Judge shall first decide the petitioners' intervention application—based on the liberty previously granted by the Supreme Court—before hearing the respondents' application for 50% compensation disbursal, with all parties receiving adequate opportunity to be heard. The petition is disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case