R. NARASIMHA REDDY vs N. RAMESH . — C.A. No. 10382/2013

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010196852009

Filing Date

06-Jul-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 10382/2013

Diary Number

19685/2009

Order Date

23-Sep-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R. NARASIMHA REDDY

    Adv. E. R. SUMATHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.N. RAMESH .

    Adv. K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 02-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 06-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 29-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 31-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 09-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 04-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 26-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 09-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 05-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 14-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 28-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 30-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 14-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 04-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 30-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 22-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 27-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 13-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 10-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 06-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 10382/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court allowed R. Narasimha Reddy's appeal against the Karnataka High Court's order, which had dismissed his suit by upholding the respondents' application under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) CPC. The Supreme Court held that the application raised a substantial question on the applicability of Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act that required evidence and could not be decided summarily. The case was remitted to the trial court to proceed with the suit on merits without being bound by the High Court's findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case