S.K.BANSAL vs H.U.D.A. — C.A. No. 1121/2012
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010193232011
Filing Date
01-Jul-2011
Registration No
C.A. No. 1121/2012
Diary Number
19323/2011
Order Date
30-Oct-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.K.BANSAL
Adv. HARESH RAICHURA
Respondent(s)
-
1.H.U.D.A.
Adv. MONIKA GUSAIN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Oct-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Oct-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
05-Jan-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Jul-2011
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1121/2012
Summary of C.A. No. 001121/2012 (S.K. Bansal v. H.U.D.A.) S.K. Bansal appealed against HUDA regarding incomplete development works that HUDA was obligated to complete under the allotment letter terms. While HUDA claimed development works were carried out, the appellants disputed this. The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal on October 30, 2018, permitting the appellants to raise the controversy before the jurisdictional Consumer Forum for resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts