RAVI PRAKSH GUPTA vs ALKA SIROHI, SECY. — CONMT.PET.(C) No. 263/2011
Case under Section Z_NOT KNOWN. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010190792011
Filing Date
28-Jun-2011
Registration No
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 263/2011
Diary Number
19079/2011
Order Date
14-Jul-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVI PRAKSH GUPTA
Adv. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
Respondent(s)
-
1.ALKA SIROHI, SECY.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jun-2011
Case filed
Registration No. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 263/2011
-
25-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2010
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: CONMT.PET.(C) No. 263/2011 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed Ravi Prakash Gupta's contempt petition on 14/07/2011. The Court found that Gupta had been assigned a cadre in Chhattisgarh (addressing his main grievance of no cadre allotment), and that no back wages were due since prior orders only mandated notional pay fixing from his actual joining date. Next Steps: The dismissal does not bar Gupta from pursuing remedies before appropriate forums regarding his cadre assignment or other grievances. Interim Application No. 5/2010 was also dismissed as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts