THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs RAJAGOPALA RAO(D) TR.LR. — C.A. No. 9236/2013
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010188252011
Filing Date
23-Jun-2011
Registration No
C.A. No. 9236/2013
Diary Number
18825/2011
Order Date
13-Feb-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Adv. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJAGOPALA RAO(D) TR.LR.
Adv. PRITHA SRIKUMAR IYER[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Sep-2018
Vacation Matter
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
13-Feb-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Feb-2018
Ordinary
Registrar (J) - IV
-
01-Feb-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul
-
14-Dec-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Dec-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
14-Dec-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
02-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
02-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
07-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul
-
19-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Sep-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
25-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jun-2011
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 9236/2013
On 13-02-2018, the Supreme Court Registrar heard CA No. 9236/2013 (Commissioner of Income Tax v. Rajagopala Rao) along with four related appeals. The Court noted that while the parties failed to file statements of case within the statutory period, such statements are not mandatory under amended Supreme Court Rules 2013. The Court directed that all matters be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts