ESTATE OFFICER,CHANDIGARH . vs BIRINDER SINGH . — SLP(C) No. 18631/2009
Case under Section XVII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010187042009
Filing Date
03-Jul-2009
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 18631/2009
Diary Number
18704/2009
Order Date
16-Sep-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ESTATE OFFICER,CHANDIGARH .
Adv. GOPAL SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.BIRINDER SINGH .
Adv. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jul-2009
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 18631/2009
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 018631/2009 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition on September 16, 2011. The Court upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's rejection of the Estate Officer's application for restoration of appeal, finding the delay in filing (over 2.5 years after dismissal for non-prosecution) was not satisfactorily explained and the grounds citing counsel's death lacked necessary particulars. Background: The respondent (Birinder Singh) had purchased a residential site in Chandigarh for Rs.23,50,000 but alleged deficiency of service due to missing basic amenities. A consumer commission awarded him 18% interest on deposits and Rs.15,000 compensation. The petitioner's appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution, and their subsequent restoration attempt was rejected due to unexplained delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts