ESTATE OFFICER,CHANDIGARH . vs BIRINDER SINGH . — SLP(C) No. 18631/2009

Case under Section XVII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010187042009

Filing Date

03-Jul-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 18631/2009

Diary Number

18704/2009

Order Date

16-Sep-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ESTATE OFFICER,CHANDIGARH .

    Adv. GOPAL SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIRINDER SINGH .

    Adv. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 15-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 16-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 15-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 15-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 11-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 27-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 03-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 18631/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 018631/2009 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition on September 16, 2011. The Court upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's rejection of the Estate Officer's application for restoration of appeal, finding the delay in filing (over 2.5 years after dismissal for non-prosecution) was not satisfactorily explained and the grounds citing counsel's death lacked necessary particulars. Background: The respondent (Birinder Singh) had purchased a residential site in Chandigarh for Rs.23,50,000 but alleged deficiency of service due to missing basic amenities. A consumer commission awarded him 18% interest on deposits and Rs.15,000 compensation. The petitioner's appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution, and their subsequent restoration attempt was rejected due to unexplained delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case