STATE TRADING CORP.OF INDIA LTD. vs M/S BISHAN SAROOP RAM KISHAN A.P.LTD — Crl.A. No. 723/2014
Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010186192009
Filing Date
02-Jul-2009
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 723/2014
Diary Number
18619/2009
Order Date
01-Apr-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE TRADING CORP.OF INDIA LTD.
Adv. S. S. JAUHAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S BISHAN SAROOP RAM KISHAN A.P.LTD
Adv. ASHWANI KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jul-2009
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 723/2014
Case Summary: State Trading Corp. of India Ltd. v. M/S Bishan Saroop Ram Kishan A.P. Ltd. Crl.A. No. 723/2014 | Supreme Court of India | April 1, 2014 The Supreme Court allowed STC's appeals against the Delhi High Court's February 19, 2009 judgment that had quashed two cheque bounce complaints (under Negotiable Instruments Act §138). STC issued two undated cheques as security for a Rs. 150 crore transaction, which were dishonored with "payment stopped" notes. The High Court had quashed proceedings, holding the cheques were security, not debt discharge. The Supreme Court reversed this, finding questions of whether cheques constituted debt security are factual issues requiring trial evidence and cannot be decided under §482 CrPC. The court set aside the High Court's judgment and remitted the matters to the trial court for decision according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts